Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plush (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Plush_(film). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Plush (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable e-book/novel. Fails WP:NOTBOOK. red dog six (talk) 00:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't find the book in Amazon's catalog, appears to be self-published ebook fan fiction. The author, Kate Crash, appears likely non-notable as well. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - The Amazon link is — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddogsix (talk • contribs) 20:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, thanks; issue remains self published and no book reviews. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 03:20, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  03:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. This just isn't a notable book. I can see where Crash had some limited involvement as some of her songs are on the soundtrack, but I don't see where this is actually an official book for the movie in any context. IF it can be proved that the book is an official tie-in or it gets any actual coverage in relation to the movie (it gets mentioned in press for the movie, etc) then it could be added to that article in the future. I'm just hesitant about adding a non-notable person's self-published book to an article when you figure that the book isn't an official part of the film and was "inspired by" the movie itself. For that matter, I'm kind of leaning towards redirecting the film to the director's page if we can't find enough sources to show that the film passes WP:NFF. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, I missed the big honking mention of the book on the official movie website. I don't know why it didn't show up when I was first looking in Google, but oh well. I'm changing my vote to redirect to Plush_(film). Other than a brief mention on that page, it doesn't merit its own article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:54, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.