Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pluto (2016 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Pluto (2016 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The film outlined in this topic has not been made, even after the rights to create the film were acquired by a company to do so in 2010. Since then, there has not been any news in regards to this film being made or being in production. Also, this article was formerly a redirect to Pluto (manga), but since there has been no reportable news in regards to the future of this film, or if it will even be started, this is a complete WP:CRYSTALBALL situation. Steel1943 (talk) 23:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Redirect but per policy it can for now to be spoken of at Pluto (manga) where information can be added and sourced until a film article meets WP:NF. An article may be one day welcome, but this one is simply a case of being TOO SOON.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The problem I see with the option of retargeting this title to its applicable section is: the date in the disambiguator is actually a year that not even sources site. It was given its current year disambiguator to move its attributions and allow Pluto (2012 film) to move over Pluto (film). So, unless a different disambiguator can be decided on that does not include a year, the redirect could be interpreted as misleading. Steel1943  (talk) 08:44, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yup. It's plans can still be spoken of at Pluto (manga), but I agree the title is unsure.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now. Acquiring the rights to something doesn't always guarantee a result. So, to be safe, delete the page, wait until we get more confirmation on this film, and once we do, remake the page; plans change, you know. Pyrotle …  the "y" is silent, BTW.  02:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --SephyTheThird (talk) 19:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect per MQS - No need for an article right not so may aswell point editors to something worth reading. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't disagree with you, but if redirecting is the answer, I think it should not be done with this title. The disambiguator is erroneous on purpose since its previous title, Pluto (film), was freed to move another article, Pluto (2012 film), onto it. Maybe a separate redirect can be created to the section (Pluto (manga)), such as Pluto (manga film). Redirecting from a title with an erroneous, uncited date would just confuse readers. Steel1943  (talk) 07:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I still think this planned film can be spoken of in the suggested target, but in digging, I realized the term "Pluto (2016 film)" is not a searchable term and thus have reversed myself.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:15, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as TOOSOON - I was actually gonna vote as such but meh shit happens, Would've been nice if the Echo thing worked as I could've changed this 3 days ago!. – Davey 2010 Talk 04:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete under WP:TOOSOON and because of my possibly impulsive decision to become deletionist. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.