Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pluto Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While there are some questions as to justifications provided, there is more than sufficient consensus that there are suitable sources pertaining to the article subject (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Pluto Press

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. References are passing mentions, inclusions in lists, blogs, the press's own web site, etc. (PROD removed by an IP editor who gave no explanation.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:26, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * KEEP. I read through the article and a number of the citations and the subject matter is notable under the rules for WP:ORG for the following reasons.
 * The authors and books published by Press are themselves notable. Almost every one listed in the article has their own wikipedia entry and fits notability guidelines.
 * The article has SIGNIFICANT COVERAGE in MULTIPLE INDEPENDENT, RELIABLE, and SECONDARY Sources.
 * The publishers had obituaries in the Guardian.
 * Entries in a academic work Revolutionary History.
 * Coverage in Michigan Daily about controversial decision to no longer distribute publisher.
 * If anything, the article could be expanded. --Auldhouse (talk) 15:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per Auldhouse (who knows what he's talking about after a career in the publishing industry). --NSH001 (talk) 07:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Auldhouse as well. Sources have significant coverage and the press releases by the company are notable. AmericanAir88 (talk) 15:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes GNG. Significant left wing publisher. Carrite (talk) 17:07, 29 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.