Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plymouth Police Explorer Post


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  02:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Plymouth Police Explorer Post
Non-notable local chapter of an otherwise notable organization. This would be like an article on each Elks lodge or Boy Scout troop. No verifiability or independent sources offered. Metros232 01:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and from no reliable sources from this Google search. --Wafulz 01:13, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —C.Fred (talk) 02:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete Plymouth Police Explorers Post 905 is a real post. http://www.mnleexplorer.org/featured.htm They have been doing extremely well the past few years and have gained considerable noteriety. They were recently asked to host a twin cities metro wide training day.--Kob0724 03:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nobody doubts that it is a real post.  It is just not notable enough to merit a Wikipedia article. --דניאל talk  contribs   Email 03:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I think they are as does the rest of my post--Kob0724 03:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I understand your frustration. My first contribution to Wikipedia was Wisconsin Region BBYO.  That wasn't just a chapter but an entire region of chapters that got deleted for the same reason that this page will be deleted.  Don't let it discourage you and keep up your contributions to Wikipedia.  --דניאל talk  contribs   Email 04:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete: Not even close to meeting anything at Notability (organizations). No significant reliable sources either. --Hetar 04:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Chris Griswold 06:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.