Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plymouth Voyager & Chrysler Voyager


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  01:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Plymouth Voyager & Chrysler Voyager
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Attempted copy-and-paste merge of Plymouth Voyager and Chrysler Voyager. There is no question that these two articles should be merged, but only through the normal merging process. Delete. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 16:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Additionally, the title Plymouth Voyager & Chrysler Voyager is inappropriate because it is too long. The title should be Plymouth Voyager with a redirect from Chrysler Voyager --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 17:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete per above. This should be speedy deleted -- Antonio Lopez  (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think it qualifies for speedy deletion, except maybe under criterion G6. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 17:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * true-- Antonio Lopez (talk) 18:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, but probably speediable (G6). — Travis talk  21:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Improper, sloppy merger without consensus attempted or attained. I do not necessarily agree with Blanchardb that there's "no question" the articles should be merged; there are cogent arguments for and against such a merger, and Blanchardb's recommendations regarding a combined article's title and redirects is US-centric and not necessarily optimal. However, those are questions to be discussed on the talk page of Plymouth Voyager and/or Chrysler Voyager (and/or Dodge Caravan). —Scheinwerfermann (talk) 21:03, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, wrong way to go about merger (which I don't think is warranted, the Plymouth brand had a long history before it was folded into Chrysler). --Dhartung | Talk 23:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:GFDL copyright violation to merge content without the histories that gives attribution to the original contributors. This is a derivative work. Suggest rolling everything back before the disruption and following the proper merge proposal and implementation procedures if merger is approved. --NrDg 23:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I noticed that the source articles are now back to their original state and nothing links to the subject article. We can let the 5 day AfD timer play out and ignore this article until it is deleted.--NrDg 23:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - merged against consensus. Ref (chew) (do) 00:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.