Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plyrics

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Joyous (talk) 01:14, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

Plyrics
A website with a forum attached to it. Wikipedia is not a web directory. Francs2000 | Talk 01:41, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless re-written. No particularly useful content at present, but the site's alexa rank is a surprisingly respectable 6,059. Flowerparty  talk 02:05, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain. 138,000 google results. That plus its Alexa rank may be grounds for notability, but it would definitely need a rewrite. Jaxl | talk 02:50, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jaxl | talk 03:59, 25 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. The content here is very poor and, if cleaned up and pared back to the facts...there'd be nothing but the link which would be grounds for a speedy. Being a website doesn't make you more notable than most of the other 8 billion websites. -Splash 03:38, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete it, revive it, then delete it again for good measure. Non-encyclopedic article can serve no purpose but to promote their web site.  --DavidConrad 03:56, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a web directory or advertising service. Isomorphic 04:05, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 08:09, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising. - Mgm|(talk) 08:17, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, if they hate n00bs so much, why are they advertising? the wub  "?/!"  11:01, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. It's a relatively popular website that I use rather frequently, but it's lacking any real content at the moment. --Tothebarricades 23:31, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete but leave the possibility of rewrites/resubmissions open, as it is definitely a notable site. A non-POV entry would be acceptable IMHO. -HX 23:44, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Shem(talk) 00:18, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NPOV and original research. Also, see Splash. Lomedae 00:28, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This page uses words like "n00bs" indicating that it is advertising. This is what the article appears to be. There are also several opinions in the article as well.--Rschen7754
 * Sorry, didn't realize that it was an actual "word". My opinion remains. --Rschen7754 22:06, August 31, 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.