Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pn ratio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Pn ratio

 * — (View AfD)

Prod removed by anon without comment. Supposedly a "controversial" rating method for university American football coaches, but I can find no sources to indicate it exists at all, or is the subject of any notice, much less controversy. Likely Original research, no sources, clearly not notable. Fan-1967 04:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A protologism at the very least. --AbsolutDan (talk) 04:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; the article and everything (translation: nothing) I find on it leads me to suspect this is, at best, relevant only within a small portion of the blogosphere that's well below the threshold of notability. Does not satisfy WP:NEO at best; violates WP:OR at worst. -- Kinu t /c  07:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, if it were even being discussed in the blogosphere it would show up in a GSearch, and it doesn't. No indication this has been shared with anyone before this article. Fan-1967 18:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. MER-C 07:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. J I P  | Talk 09:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - too short, not very meaningful content, and possibly original research.  Insane  phantom   (please comment on my Editor Review!)  11:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.