Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poblacion V, Calamba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Calamba, Laguna. With arguments split between whether or not redirection is appropriate, that discussion is probably best held at WP:RFD. Hog Farm Talk 04:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Poblacion V, Calamba

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Same concern as that of Articles for deletion/Poblacion 1, Calamba. No sufficient sources (only one is provided: ), possibly not notable, and has a WP:DIRECTORY-like content (education). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. jp×g 03:58, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. jp×g 03:58, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Calamba, Laguna: Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Not all Barangays are notable. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and do NOT redirect as it would be an implausible redirect. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 07:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I think redirecting is fine, as the topic exists at Calamba, Laguna. I would suggest, however, to delete and redirectto prevent immediate resurrection of the unworthy article content. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.