Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocahontas Middle School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 01:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Pocahontas Middle School
Nothing but vandalism being added to this article. As this is a middle school, it barely meets criteria to be notable anyway. There are very few constructive edits being inputted into the article, but instead it's being used as a playground for vandals. // Pilotguy  ( Cleared to land ) 22:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Although i'm sure there will be some people voting keep and claiming that all schools are notable (which is not true). TJ Spyke 00:25, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to assert notability.-- Hús  ö  nd  02:40, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to use sources satisfying WP:INDY so it is impossible to have an article adhering to both WP:V and WP:NPOV simultaneously. GRBerry 04:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as a National Blue-Ribbon School recognized school, should meet WP:SCHOOLS as well but the guideline is in flux. Yamaguchi先生 04:40, 4 November 2006
 * Speedy Keep we dont just delete stuff thats become a target of vandalism... if we did that George W. Bush and John Kerry would have been deleted long ago. We clean up the vandalism and protect it. As there is no real valid reason for this listing... this should be a Speedy keep.  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 07:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not all just about vandalism, but also the fact that it fails to assert nobiltity. // Pilotguy  ( Cleared to land ) 14:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No attempt in the article to establish notability.  Vegaswikian 03:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * weak Keep Being a blue-ribbon school is some claim of notability. JoshuaZ 02:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per JoshuaZ. --Myles Long 17:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Yamaguchi, notability is already demonstrated within the article. Silensor 22:55, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.