Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocket CO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per WP:SNOW J.delanoy gabs adds  20:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Pocket CO

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No sign of notability, Wikipedia is not an advertising. It could be a blatant ad. ApprenticeFan  talk  contribs 14:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as advertising. The article is written as fluff and has little if any salvageable material, on a topic (a particular device) which is not especially notable.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 14:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per TeaDrinker.--Talain (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:41, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising by Company Staff.Further it is about a product of a particular company. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Straight forward, blatant advertising. Fuzbaby (talk) 19:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clever idea, but still spam. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 01:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - This was declined speedy previously, on the grounds that it can be rewritten. See the article history. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 01:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong (if not Speedy) Delete - Blatant ad. If the article were cleaned up and rewritten so it's not pushing a product, the result would be a borderline A7. &mdash; Ledgend  Gamer  06:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Article creator (User:Dabouav) would appear to be David Abouav, Director for Embedded Systems at KWJ Engineering, the company which manufactures the Pocket CO. Dabouav also created KWJ Engineering (since deleted), which suggests that he may not be familiar with Wikipedia's guidelines regarding conflict of interest and spam. faithless   (speak)  07:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.