Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocket Devil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. I wouldn't have relisted this one. Clear consensus for retention here. –MuZemike 00:02, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Pocket Devil

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article does not meet the General notability guideline. All attempts to find reliable and independent sources have failed. A prod was deleted from this article previously with no discussion nor contention of its addition by an anonymous editor. Brian Reading (talk) 20:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:44, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Two potential sources are and . Alison22 (talk) 20:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I don't believe the first source would work for Wikipedia as it appears to classify as a self-published source. Since the second source is in Italian, which I can't understand, I can't really evaluate as to whether it is an acceptable source.  Is there any evidence of such? Thanks! Brian Reading (talk) 21:23, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per, , , and . Joe Chill (talk) 23:28, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources above. Alison22 (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: Alison22 has been indef blocked as sockpuppet. Pcap ping  02:25, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Joe Chill, hopefully someone will integrate those sources, as of right now the article is relying on BLOGSPOT.COM for referencing. JBsupreme (talk) 07:16, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Nifboy (talk) 23:37, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.