Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocket Frogs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Pocket Frogs

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

dubious notability Melaen (talk) 13:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Slide to Play was founded by former GameSpot staff, which should make it amply reliable in this sector. Gamezebo reviewed the game here, nice little interview on Pocket Gamer. The two reviews should be fine for notability, there are other misc. sites used currently, at least one of which (148Apps) is part of the O.A.T.S. reviewing system and is an established site which really should be enough to allow it to be used as a source. Unfortunately WP, despite being a web-based and supposedly up to the minute, is woefully behind the times and we still haven't sorted out where these app review sites fit in with WP:RS. Someoneanother 13:43, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems quite notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:18, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep There are a lot of references quoting notabilty to the article and many more if needed, a quick google search would reveal these. I see no reason why this article is not notable enough for wikipedia.  I Smashed   TALK!  15:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. There seems to be some notability here, as Someone another indicates above. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 19:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep – Looks like there is sufficient coverage out there to easily establish notability. –MuZemike 12:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.