Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocket ammunition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Pocket ammunition

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not merit a stand alone article. Fails GNG, majority of article is original research. An abridged version that is properly sourced could be merged to Swiss Armed Forces if consensus feels it would improve Swiss Armed Forces.  // Timothy :: talk  00:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The formerly issued ammunition is already covered in Conscription_in_Switzerland. A bit more detail could be added to the aforementioned section. A merge/redirect would be somewhat inappropriate, as "pocket ammunition" isn't a term strictly related to conscription in Switzerland or the Swiss Armed Forces. Mooonswimmer 22:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.