Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocket packet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Move to Wikipedia namespace. Stifle 23:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Pocket packet
Non-notable is only the start. The article was created by the "inventor", and therefore is unverifiable original research. Deltabeignet 22:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Reply from the creator of the article: Of course. But it's a sweet little idea which is catching on in London. It's a very modest, pro-Wikipedia microproject which has people reading Wikipedia articles at all times of day. I have contributed to a range of Wikipedia articles about serious artists and philosophers, etc; this particular entry is less serious but is, as I say, a little project promoting Wikipedia in London. So I suggest we don't kill it now but at least let it live for six months, then the community can decide to get rid of it then, if necessary. Davidgauntlett 22:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I am happy with the suggestion to Move to Pocket Packet and then I can link it into other Wikipedia project pages a bit more (minor adds only) and ... if it's still unloved in a while i can get rid of it again. Davidgauntlett 11:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to Pocket Packet - If we want to reference this, thats great. Just put it in the wikipedia space. -- Dragoonmac - If there was a problem yo I'll solve it 23:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Move as above. --Sneftel 23:49, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Move Space Cadet 12:22, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. But seriously... Move to wiki-space at will.  Dei zio  01:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Move or Userfy, unless references to use of this term on the web/academic publications/etc. can be shown (than keep). I would expect this will be eventually moved back into the mainspace as it gains a notability. Nice idea, David!--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Move Interesting if this takes off. I had thought it was an April Fools joke at first, tho'. Sorry, David :P The JPS 20:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Looks like the solution is to move to Pocket Packet, then? - Davidgauntlett 17:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.