Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocket trout


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was nomination withdrawn by nominator. &mdash; Nearly Headless Nick   {C}  14:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Pocket trout
Was originally prodded as "non-notable flashlight". I don't know of any notability standards for flashlights, but ones in the shape of fish from a notable brand qualify in my opinion. Should I bother checking for more sources? - Mgm|(talk) 11:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Seeing as I confused the editor below, let me say this is a procedural nomination. - Mgm|(talk) 13:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, why does the nominator ask if the should bother checking for more sources? Of course they should check it out as far as it reasonably possible based on the article before nominating it for deletion. My quick look shows that google gives (excluding wikipedia results) over 5 thousand hits . Though... on second thoughts it appears it is also slang for cock. Found a photo of it . Anyway..... my point is that this nomination should have been thought out a little bit more beforehand. Oh, though hang on.... it would appear from reading the nomination they are not even advocating the deletion of the article? Sounds like a possible candidate for a speedy close if they withdraw their nomination....   Mathmo Talk 13:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * On second thought, withdraw nomination. - Mgm|(talk) 13:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.