Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocketonline

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:22, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Pocketonline
This article was marked as &#123;&#123;db&#125;&#125; by Melaen (talk &middot; contributions) for vanity, but that is not a criterion for speedy. I myself abstain. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:31, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * at the very least it is poorly written. I suspect that it is vanity. I haven't seen a page on Google matching this description. deleteWAvegetarian 21:13, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to be some sort of forum in an asian language, possibly anime-related because all the avatars seem to be anime characters. Both low Google score and Alexa rank signify low notability. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  22:36, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Attack page on a non-English website.  Double Blue  (Talk) 01:21, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable. JamesBurns 06:20, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NN. carmeld1 02:42, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .