Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poco Discography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Is that a flake or two? (non-admin closure) treelo  radda  00:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Poco Discography

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is just a list of songs which already appear in the template--is the duplication necessary? I don't think so. [ roux  ] [ x ] 01:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to Poco discography Discography pages are generally allowed. This can easily be expanded with chart positions and singles. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)
 * Keep. Perfectly reasonable discography. Could maybe be merged into the Poco article, but certainly shouldn't be deleted.--Michig (talk) 07:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly a spin-off from the main article, which is perfectly acceptable. Someone could argue for a merge, but deletion certainly isn't an option. _ Mgm|(talk) 10:46, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep No obvious reason for deletion is apparent. The article can stand alone or be merged (either option is fine). Pity that WP:ILovePoco isn't policy. :) Ecoleetage (talk) 16:47, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Nothing's wrong with the discography and per TPH, this could easily be expanded to include chart positions. Nom does not give a good reason to delete, as he's using the fact that this is merely a "list of songs" (as a matter of fact, no songs appear on the article right now, and it's merely a discography of the group's albums) and it "duplicates" a template. Whereas it does right now, that can easily be cleaned up to look more like other discography pages.  Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 16:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.