Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pod slurping


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Borderline neologism. RasputinAXP  c  20:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Pod slurping
Contested brought here for consensus. History shows article was originally proposed for deletion on 21 Feb, tag was subsequently removed, and article was erroneously proposed for deletion again on 21 April. RobertG &#9836; talk 08:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC) ''This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!'' King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  03:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * No vote. --RobertG &#9836; talk 08:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Concur with RobertG -- Simon Cursitor 14:41, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Ipod or expand. --Several Times 20:23, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, neologism verified by cnet and others. &mdash; AKADriver &#x260E;  20:34, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's important enough to take seriously. I have no idea why there are two 'no votes' here. What precisely is that supposed to achieve? - Richardcavell 03:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * RobertG just brought it here to be decided since it was prodded twice by other users. I don't know what Simon Cursitor meant, though. I would guess that he meant delete, since that is the default position for those nominating articles for deletion. I would either ask him or discard his vote, if I was the one closing the nomination. -- Kjkolb 09:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - 364 unique Ghits makes it a bit borderline. I have a feeling this neologism will be dead and buried in five years, but for now it seems to have acheived some notability.  --Hyperbole 04:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a neologism. -- Kjkolb 09:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Ipod until the term comes into more general usage. Kevin 12:28, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Kevin. Or delete.  But not a separate article, thanks. Just zis Guy you know? 14:28, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO.--Isotope23 16:14, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Kjkolb and Isotope23. -- Amalas  =^_^=  16:42, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with ipod Real issue, unnotable neologism. or Delete--Nick Y. 01:14, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO RobLinwood 02:14, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Ipod. Vizjim 16:08, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.