Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podar Education Complex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep - Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 16:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Podar Education Complex

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete Total non-article poorly written and lacking content Jack1956 (talk) 23:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep In view of the work done on the article I withdraw the nomination. Jack1956 (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Keep From looking at the PEC's website there might be room for improvement of this article, though it should definitely be tagged either for cleanup or as a stub. Proofreading to correct the poor writing style is a must.MarquisCostello (talk) 23:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Delete Had I seen this in its original state, I would have speedied it as purely intended to denigrate, as there was no useful content for an article. Now that a decent version has been restored, there are no problems except to watch it.. DGG (talk) 02:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC) DGG (talk) 06:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as WP:CSD A1, "No Context". May be pushing it slightly and I would normally say A7, but that explicitly does not apply to schools.  There is no content here worth having, and if someone wants to write this article, they'd be fine starting off fresh.  Cool3 (talk) 02:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Change to Weak Keep.
 * Comment. I have removed the vandalism by IPs and restored the article to the last version by Naughtyhaff. Salih  ( talk ) 04:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —  Salih  ( talk ) 04:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I have removed some further personal commentary added by User:Naughtyhaff . Reviewers who have already commented are requested to take another look at the pre-vandalized version of the article. Abecedare (talk) 05:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see, I was taken in by the vandalized version. In light of this new evidence, I am changing to a Weak Keep, also there is media coverage, which I have included in the article. Cool3 (talk) 05:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the relook, and the added source. We almost let vandals (most likely kids from the same or a rival school) pull wool over our eyes on this one! Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 05:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep A series of high schools with over 25,000 students certainly meets WP:SCHOOL. Also see news-coverage in mainstream Indian press . Abecedare (talk) 05:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Nice job of cleanup. Edward321 (talk) 05:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as the nomination is withdrawn. Salih  ( talk ) 15:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.