Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podbharti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus, defaults to keep. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 02:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Podbharti

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

not notable... no credible references...ChiragPatnaik (talk) 09:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:45, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unreferenced, orphaned article. Only found a single 3rd party reference which does not meet the "significant coverage" that WP:N requires.--Rtphokie (talk) 12:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;Sean Whitton / 14:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wizardman  21:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

*Delete, Fails notability .--SkyWalker (talk) 04:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. The only reference I could find was this article in a publication I've never heard of. Pburka (talk) 01:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC) Pburka (talk) 01:50, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, Iam changing the vote to keep. As there is enough of reference in article to prove the article is notable. Here are more source to prove it, , . I will search for more. --SkyWalker (talk) 16:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep: Simply because Google News doesn't list a website shouldn't mean its not notable. The website is from India, is in Hindi, and its natural that foreign publications won't talk about it. The page already cites noted website reviews/links. IMHO, the fact that its the first Hindi podzine from the subcontinent alone should make it notable enough.--Debashishc (talk) 13:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, appears to have third party references now.--Boffob (talk) 16:00, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Reaffirm delete has someone noticed that this site is down as of now? Also please note one of the references is to agencyfaqs.com which says that one of the authors of this blog is Debashish Chakrabarty. The same gentlemen who pitched to several people to change their vote. A gaping case of Conflict of Interest perhaps? ChiragPatnaik (talk) 15:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.