Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podfomercial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --Joann e B 13:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Podfomercial
Spammy neologism. Look it up and you'll know what I mean. -- Perfecto 01:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Perfecto 01:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --NaconKantari 01:03, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nooby god 01:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, christ, someone make all the 'pod' portmanteaus speedyable, already! O bli (Talk) 02:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dharmabum420 02:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Aaron 03:30, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 04:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as podcruft and ibollocks Segv11 (talk/contribs) 05:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologismcruft Cyde Weys votetalk 06:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It's a disgrace to the English language, to boot.  --zenohockey 06:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete (mild) as per nomination --- Responses to Chazz's talk page. Signed by Chazz @ 12:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete yet another podcruft neologism Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 14:12, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Izehar 18:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per non. Batmanand 18:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Dustimagic 19:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.