Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podma Pettit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was deleted by User:UtherSRG due to being prodded for 5 days. --ais523 08:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Podma Pettit
This is not an encylopedia article -- it might count as a contribution towards Talk:Foot fetishism Aleph-4 13:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. I believe it is normal procedure to not list an article for AfD when it is already prodded. Anyway, this is clearly Original research, like the author states, and is thus a violation of WP:NOR and a clear candidate for deletion, no matter if it is viaprod or AfD. Fram 14:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Concerning procedure: you are right.  But I had writted this afd2 page before I noticed the prod on the article, so I thought I should complete the nomination anyway.Aleph-4 14:17, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.