Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poemedy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 02:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Poemedy

 * – (View AfD) (View log) Unencyclopedic content

Zginder 00:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong delete: The article describes a word that appears to be either made up or in such uncommon usage that it might as well be. A Google search for it reveals 95 uses of the word on the entire Internet, a pretty good indicator of a complete lack of notability. Pyrospirit  ( talk  ·  contribs ) 00:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - transwiki to wiktionary if it's not already there - it';s more their thing than ours by a long way. Note: It would have been useful if the nominator had actually given a reason for the nomination, rather than just adding his/her sig. Grutness...wha?  00:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to Wiktionary Per Grutness. -- Astroview 120  mm  00:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO Skomorokh  incite 01:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Delete it sounds like a "made up" or less than common word of use. It may be a regional based word?Jayson 02:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: If I didn't strongly believe it was a hoax, I would say TransWiki. - Rjd0060 05:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  17:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.