Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poesybeat (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Poesybeat
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable WP:NEOLOGISM. Only "WP:SIGCOV" is in a self-published book. Refs are specious. First nom was in 2005, so I think this deserves fresh consideration. Related AfD ended in delete. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 13:37, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Barely found anything about it. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 11:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: not uninteresting, and could probably support a Wiktionary entry if anyone were minded to make one, but clearly non-notable. The only reliable source cited in the article devotes a single short paragraph to the subject. I haven't been able to find any other coverage in reliable sources. The keep !votes in 2005 AfD lack a basis in policy, even by the standards of the time. (The self-published book linked above probably wouldn't contribute to notability even if it weren't self-published, as its coverage of the subject seems to be directly copied from our article.) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.