Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poet Tree


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 02:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Poet Tree

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I found no significant coverage. Non-notable magazine. SL93 (talk) 20:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - The magazine is published in Bangladesh; are you sure there are no Bangladeshi sources that we have missed? ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No, the question is are you sure there is? SL93 (talk) 21:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't mean that rudely. I mean that just because it is from a different country with a different language, it doesn't mean that this article should stay. If no one comes to this AfD with sources, then this can be deleted. If sources come later, it can be recreated like any other article. SL93 (talk) 21:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete: This is an obscure literary magazine with very little coverage in Bangladeshi media. Mostly, the coverage seems to be pushed forward by the magazine's editor. I didn't find any independent coverage of the magazine. If you want to verify, please search Google with the magazine's Bengali transliteration পোয়েট ট্রি . Note that the magazine's author has flooded a few blog sites with user name Poet Tree or poetry, so you should disregard such entries. --Ragib (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.