Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poetic Flow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 03:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Poetic Flow

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This appears to be a completely non-notable book group (!) and part of a campaign to spam Wikipedia with inappropriate articles advertising the biographies, politics and activities of a coterie of unimportant local political activists in the area around Bournemouth (a minor British seaside town). Badgerpatrol 15:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as quickly as humanly possible. Badgerpatrol 15:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:RS, WP:N. Causesobad → (Talk) 15:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There is a trail of articles being created by someone connected to the central figure of Paul Hughes. Completly agree with nominatior on the spam campaign.--Tainter 15:36, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Many articles linking of this one should be looked into also.--Dacium 22:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as original author I make no attempt to defend this one - it shouldn't be here so I completely agree: get rid of this page! I must, however, question Badgerpatrol's credibility on some issues - describing Bournemouth as "a minor British seaside town" when it is, in fact, Britain's most popular seaside town and a major European holiday destination is a pretty big slip up!  CyanideSunryz 22:54, 15 February 2007
 * I meant no offence to the good people of Bournemouth btw! But the area is ranked 92nd in England by population...(see List of English districts by population) and I think describing it as a "major European holiday destination" may be a bit of a stretch. Dorset as a whole is very lovely however- well worth a visit. Badgerpatrol 00:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.