Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poetry classics to funky beats


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:27, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Poetry classics to funky beats

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be a self-published mp3. No evidence of notability. maclean (talk) 05:03, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unencyclopedic title, written in an unencyclopedic matter, and the topic is not notable enough for its own article.--RM (Be my friend) 05:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Couldn't find any significant coverage on the subject. The article itself doesn't make any indication of notability. Lugia2453 (talk) 19:31, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable PianoDan (talk) 20:55, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability, unencyclopedic. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 23:49, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - As per the nominator. Not Notable, could not meet significant coverage. Amartyabag   TALK2ME  07:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No independent coverage found, no evidence of notability. — sparklism  hey! 08:07, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.