Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point 453


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 19:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Point 453

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only a few mentions in local sources. Does not meet WP:NFILM Neil N  talk to me 00:04, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 00:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability, WP:COI promotion. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   00:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   00:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - the author clearly has a COI, and this is clearly WP:TOOSOON for an unknown 2017 film to be notable. We really need a WP:CSD criterion for blatantly non-notable films. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete for all of the aforementioned reasons. I also second 's idea of a speedy category for non-notable films - maybe even a more generalized non-notable "creative works" (e.g. films, books, etc.). These types of junk articles are way too common. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFILM. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.