Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point Isabel, Richmond, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Neighborhood, geo locations are notable and also the nominator has been blocked for sockpuppetry and disruption.-- JForget  00:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Point Isabel, Richmond, California

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

not a notable neighborhood, way too small CholgatalK! 09:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC) ...and speedy close - article is now adequately sourced. Nomination is by a confirmed sockpuppet, whose recent deletion spree was part of the abusive behavior that got him indefinitely blocked. Wikidemo (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete-per me/nomCholgatalK! 15:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable. Wikidemo (talk) 19:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see anything notable about most neighborhoods, and particularly not this one. It has a big dog park and a Costco, which seems to mean it's a nice place to visit if you happen to take a wrong turn and somehow end up in Richmond, California.  Although every neighborhood is special to someone, we already have way too many articles about unincorporated villages that people have fallen in love with.   If throwing in all the neighborhoods in every city and town in the world is the next logical step in that process, the next step after that is to have articles about every street in Point Isabel.  I'd wager that most people in Richmond, CA, don't care that much about Point Isabel either.  Mandsford (talk) 22:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - lets see the outcome/end-product of the suggested 3-Article Merge first. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  12:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and Speedy Close - nominator blocked indef. as sockpuppet. Bash Kash (talk) 18:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.