Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point No. 1 (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Point No. 1.  MBisanz  talk 00:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Point No. 1 (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One of the band's singles, "The Fad", not only charted on more charts than this, but also better on both the charts it managed to receive. Its ultimate fate was deletion by PROD. Someone reverted my PROD of this one and suggested I take it here. Google search does not bring up anything relevant except for the Wikipedia result. I believe it is not worth merging as it is the title track of the album, so the search term is no longer notable. Also, there really isn't much notable content to it.  danny music editor  Speak up! 15:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 16:06, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as still nothing at all actually convincing of its own notability, clearly nothing else to suggest anything else better. SwisterTwister   talk  19:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe deckertalk 01:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge into Point No. 1. I've also been unable to find anything on Google: a Google search for "Point #1" Chevelle -Skeptic (with the song name "Skeptic" forbidden so that it will remove album searches), brings up pages of no substance at all, just lyrics pages and links to the music video and things like that, and a couple people showing how to play it on the guitar.  If someone cared enough about the song individually to actually write about it, they either didn't do it on the web, or hid it well. --Closeapple (talk) 17:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.