Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point No Point Treaty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. Ifnord 18:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Point No Point Treaty
Was marked for Proposed deletion (nomination), but Kmweber removed the tag without comment. This is source material that's already on Wikisource, with zero encyclopedic content. &#8212;Cryptic (talk) 21:13, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete if article already exists on WikiSource per nom. --Kinu 22:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Treaty of Neah Bay. &#8212;Cryptic (talk) 23:30, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Don't end it, mend it Ruby 00:03, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, already on Wikisource, no need for it here. Stifle 00:14, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * This article isn't on Wikisource because I totally re-wrote it as an encyclopedia article, and I didn't transwiki it to wikisource. Please read the articles before voting for them.  Ruby 00:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Obvious keep now that it's been rewritten. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates! ) 19:45, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Kappa 03:57, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.