Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point nine nine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Dan O'Mahony. v/r - TP 15:25, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Point nine nine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This only seems like a small non-profit group. Not listing for speedy because there is 10 links which need to be verified. Thebirdlover (talk) 05:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Well, the first 5 links are from the group itself. The 6th link is on another website, but links back to the group's website, so not reliable. Links 7-9 are links to other websites, but are Q&As that the group did with various politicians. Link #10 is another link to the group's website. All in all, none of these links can be considered to be reliable since they are released by the group themselves, even though they're occasionally hosted on other sites.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:32, 10 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

--Thebirdlover (talk) 07:12, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply. Does that mean I should nominate it for a speedy?
 * Response. Doesn't satisfy G11 or A7 IMO. Best just to let the Afd run its course. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:40, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:04, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dan O'Mahony. The group in and of itself doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines at this time for its own article, but is absolutely worth a mention on O'Mahony's page. If/when it gets to where it has enough reliable coverage to get its own page, then go through the process of re-adding it to the mainspace. I'd see if the original contributor wants to userfy it, if possible.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:27, 19 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.