Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pointless article


 * Orphan self-referential article. Not enencyclopedic. -- Seth Ilys 21:41, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, pointless. Angela. 22:41, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, and Self-referential article, which redirects to it. -- Cyrius|&#9998 22:49, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Pretty clever though - it's just turned itself into a performance piece. Could we keep it on the jokes page? --Pteron 00:23, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * I like it. The article on offensive reserved words in computer languages rates up there, too! Kd4ttc 03:08, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Fennec 04:38, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. But agree, BJAODN. Andrewa 17:12, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not funny, either. Cribcage 04:51, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * I vote to delete, but not without some reservations. I admit I got a chuckle out of the last line!  Lucky 6.9 23:31, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jacob1207 22:49, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Pointless article. JRR Trollkien 22:38, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Did you notice the last line's hyperlink URL? "HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ME, etc.."