Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poison Pen (2014 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 22:11, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Poison Pen (2014 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFILM Legacypac (talk) 22:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep has reviews in reliable sources such as The Chicago Reader here and Hollywood Reporter here, passes WP:GNG. The search term Poison Pen (2014 film) gives no results but there are relevant hits with Poison Pen (film) although they have to be picked out of a mass of google hits Atlantic306 (talk) 23:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources found by . Also found this by Film Ireland. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 00:39, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete The film fails all the criteria for NFILM even if there are reviews because criteria 1 states :"The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics". There are the 2 critics but I don't think it has been widely distributed all the reviews seem to be from festival showings. Domdeparis (talk) 09:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment it does not have to meet the criteria of WP:NFILM if it passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 10:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, what said. WP:NFILM clearly states that WP:GNG is the primary guideline to follow, and the more specific guidelines at WP:NFILM are in addition to the general guideline, not its replacement. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 13:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - the sources identified above were the best I could find. It's not a lot of coverage, but enough to meet WP:GNG.  gongshow  talk  03:12, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per the reviews found by Atlantic306.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 07:09, 5 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.