Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poison the Hedgehog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Obvious delete, tagged as probable copyvio, hoax (i.e. vandalism) and WP:SNOW. Guy (Help!) 12:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Poison the Hedgehog

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

PROD contested by page author. PROD reason was "No relevant google hits for "Poison the hedgehog"; probable hoax". I endorse the prod reason; see my opinion. Hoaxes aren't eligible for speedy deletion or I'd do it instead of this. GRBerry 01:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete One google hit, when Wikipedia is excluded, is clearly not video game related. .  Hoaxes should be deleted.  GRBerry 01:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Almost certainly a hoax, and unverified at any rate. Heimstern Läufer 01:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-noteable fan-made character. --FlareNUKE 01:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete almost certainly a fanfic character, else hoax. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Probable hoax, only google hit is irrelevant. Exarion 03:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: 99% sure it is a hoax. Not only is there no evidence of his existence on the page, but as a fan of the series, I know very sure he is not real, or at least not official. JackSparrow Ninja 03:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm the one that prodded it.  Video game stuff, if real, gets tons of ghits, even obscure people you only talk to once. Dave6 06:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete upon the grounds of being a non-notable fanfic character, cruft, copyvio, and lacking substantial enough notability.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 08:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fancruft that completely and utterly fails the search engine test. Metrackle 10:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per Dave6 --Arctic Gnome 16:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom.  P.B. Pilhet  /  Talk   18:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unsourced fanfic, and fanfic characters are rarely worthy of an article.-- danntm T C 18:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Why would we want to poison a hedgehog? They're so cute! Oh, wait. Um... Fan character, looks like, no sources... okay, yeah, get the arsenic. Delete Tony Fox (arf!) 21:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete without expressing an opinion on the cuteness of hedgehogs. JCO312 23:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, a prank article. Besides, faux hoax hedgehogs look cutest when they've been plastered by the tyre of a Morris Minor. Tubezone 07:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.Gravity Talk 10:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.