Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poiwan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 08:13, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Poiwan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTE not notable in itself as a village. Even if it has notable people from there Not in herited Amortias (T)(C) 10:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Looks like an actual population center to me and with a population of over 2,000. --Oakshade (talk) 17:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  17:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep The village has a population larger than 2,000. I have seen articles about counties having lesser population.--Skr15081997 (talk) 09:12, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Officially recognized populated places are keepers by longstanding consensus. (Can't find that policy, but it's out there somewhere.) Clarityfiend (talk) 01:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.