Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Highway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. (aeropa gitica) 12:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Pokémon Highway
Does not meet WP:WEB. NN Pokecruft site. Delete. exolon 19:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not only non-notable, but remarkably elusive; the link in the article was a 404 when I tried it. Googling did eventually reveal a forum with the same logo, here, which has 49 members, well below what WP:WEB proposes used to propose.  Note that Google returns only 26 results (!) for "pokemon highway", and most of those are nothing to do with the league in question -- sites with text like "hardcore hentai pokemon highway protection" (I didn't dare look further) are rated higher than the actual league!  Sorry, but I just don't see this being important enough to warrant an article in an encyclopedia. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 22:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Neier 22:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can we speedy as a not-notable group? :) Dlohcierekim 02:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Regular delete per nom. Websites don't fall under A7. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 07:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang ( chat/patch ) 12:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination, existant for the sake of the Diamond and Pearl article? --T e tsuya-san (talk : contribs) 15:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy as unremarkable group/vanity page WP:SPEEDY Altair 19:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: Article refers to the actual league (group of people) and not the website in question. Altair 19:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Pokécruft. GarrettTalk 01:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.