Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Scarlet and Violet: The Hidden Treasure of Area Zero


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Pokémon Scarlet and Violet. Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Pokémon Scarlet and Violet: The Hidden Treasure of Area Zero

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Redirect was objected to on the basis of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. This article doesn't say much more than what's already in the relevant section in the Pokemon Scarlet and Violet article. WP:NOPAGE says "Sometimes, a notable topic can be covered better as part of a larger article, where there can be more complete context that would be lost on a separate page" ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:47, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:47, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect Frankly, I think this is a clear candidate for a merge discussion rather than an AfD given that it is crazy to imagine it being deleted. However, it seems like an instance of WP:TOOSOON. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:35, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * There's not really much to merge here, hence why I went for an AFD. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'd assume that a merge discussion technically includes redirects sans merging if the article is not something that merits outright deletion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect: for now, this is TOOSOON. The article gives no information that is not covered in the main game article (the lede just being an extrapolation of the copied over development section). The article has already been redirected multiple times. OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a poor argument on its own, but comparing a DLC that has been out for three years to a DLC still in development is not a fair comparison. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 16:25, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect. I'm not opposed to it being separate, even at this stage, but it needs to have more substance than this. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 16:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per WP:TOOSOON. Blitzfan51 19:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect: While i'm not opposed to a separate page on the DLC, it hasn't even come out yet, and all the info we have on it is included in the main games page, so as of right now, a separate page is unnecessary LordEnma8 (talk) 18:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify and redirect: It's too soon to have articles on DLC that hasn't released yet. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 22:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect as it's TOOSOON for a full article. That said, an AfD seems silly, as this will likely be recreated without controversy in time.--<b style="background:#8B0000;color:#FFF;padding:1px;">Gen. Quon</b><b style="background:#2F4F4F;color:#FFF;padding:1px;">[Talk]</b> 13:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The only reason I went for an AfD is because a merge discussion didn't seem appropriate since there isn't much to merge and there isn't exactly something I can do to propose it be merged. ― <b style="background:#0d1125;color:#51aeff;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Blaze Wolf</b>Talk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">Blaze Wolf#6545 14:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)


 * for right now merge into Pokémon Scarlet and Violet. Since it's the dlc of that game, if it's noticeable enough or starts to take up a lot of space on that page once it releases, then we can split it off
 * LuxembourgBoy42 (talk) 02:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect for now, it is too soon and not much content. Fulmard (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per WP:TOOSOON. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.