Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokemon - chaos black


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete. Nihiltres ( t .l ) 12:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Pokemon - chaos black

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article that cannot be verified by any reliable sources. No reliable publication has ever seen fit to comment on hacked versions of Pokémon games. In any case, it does not need its own article, and nobody is likely to type this exact string in. hbdragon88 22:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete, does not assert notabiltiy. --Sigma 7 02:44, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Not notable at all. Realkyhick 03:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Although a google search shows that it is possible to verify the contents of this article, I am not too sure whether it is notable enough to warrant an article by itself. Also, it must be noted that there are over 32 000 hits for the subject matter. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 09:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment This kind of article denigrates the respectable field of cartoon character research. ~ Infrangible 16:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete non notable--Zxcvbnm 18:04, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Where did the user who created the article get this information from? (Woggy 19:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC))
 * Coment The user most probably got the information from this website. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 03:11, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete recreation of deleted article. This guy may be a sock, because I think the guy who originally created the aricle ended up being banned because he kept remaking it. This was a couple of months ago, so I don't remember much, but this was here before and was speedy deleted HalfShadow 23:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Tagged. I tried reading through the paragraph, and couldn't really understand what's going on - especially when I get to the last sentence. --Sigma 7 09:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.