Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polar Bear-baiting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   23:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Polar Bear-baiting
"Perhaps, due to the infrequent occurrences of the baiting of Polar Bears, few written citations can be found." - Fails WP:V Hipocrite - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 11:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not notable. DarthVad e r 11:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, flummery. What's with all the "-baiting" articles of late? Kafziel 11:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge all these -baiting articles into a single, master baiting article. Oh, never mind, delete. -- GWO
 * LOL. PJM 14:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. PJM 14:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Author has been banned for disruption and personal attacks, so that also throws the credibility of this article into doubt.  --Elkman 16:13, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing in this article besides one sentence and two long quotes —M e ts501 talk 16:38, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete absolute trash. Danny Lilithborne 00:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Little content or context --Starionwolf 23:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.