Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polarhome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 21:03, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Polarhome

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

This is a non-notable and unsourced website that actually complies with the CSD criteria for web content. The only sources present in the article is a link to the home page of the website. The only sources found on google news, google books, or google scholar are the domain name of the website in the URL about other things. Polarhome is a minor webhost with a few barely notable software projects on it. It is not independently notable. Miami33139 (talk) 17:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Today I located 2 reliable sources which I have placed on the talk page. This is sufficient for notability. --Hm2k (talk) 20:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The domain name appearing in someone's essay is not a source. Miami33139 (talk) 20:20, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 20:35, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * 'Delete' There's nothing interesting or notable about this subject.Callivert (talk) 08:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.