Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poldervokaal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. J I P | Talk 13:21, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Poldervokaal
Article asserts that two CDs have been recorded, but does not state whether they have been released or not. No vote. - Liberatore(T) 18:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Have had a squizz at their website, but doesn't say there either if the cd's have been released. Given that they seem to be at least semi-pro I'm going Weak Keep Jcuk 21:40, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - per CSD A7 Ruby 21:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Even though there's some information about the second CD on google and their site, including a release date, it still seems rather nn Hirudo 21:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - CDs have been released and sold, see above. From the Dutch press reviews, choir seems to be relatively local, but well-appreciated for its quality. Obscurity is not necessarily criterion for deletion user:rutten 156.109.10.17 11:45, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks! Deathphoenix' 01:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Why is having "released CDs" so important? I interpret WP:MUSIC as a guideline. The notability is admittedly rather local, but appears to be genuine (based on the reviews and other information on the Internet). The group is not a one-day wonder but has been in operation for twenty years. Lambiam 05:04, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. Almost no google hits. Isn't even listed on the dutch wiki. Dr Debug (Talk) 05:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Turnstep 19:58, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not the most notable, but plenty notable enough.--ragesoss 20:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Ragesoss --kingboyk 03:04, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.