Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polesworth F.C.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Polesworth F.C.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:FOOTYN as the team has not played at level 10 or in the FA Vase or FA Cup.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  00:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  00:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Del ♉ sion 23   (talk)  00:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Del ♉ sion 23   (talk)  00:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Another episode of my hard work been put up for deletion, makes all the hard work worthwhile doesn't it, exactly what constitutes an article, as I can name millions of semi-professional/amateur teams that have an article, so please explain why you want this one deleted!! Stew jones (talk) 18:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * For one, there are no sources other than links to the official webpage and the club shop.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  00:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - its unfortunate that someone spent time creating something only for it to be deleted, but the shame is that someone spent time creating something that doesn't meet our inclusion criteria. I could create articles about each of the football teams in my local area but none of them would meet the inclusion criteria and so all of them would be deleted. Do the research, then the work. Don't do the work and then plead for mercy. The burden is on the creator to substantiate notability. While the nominator of an article for deletion should ideally justify that nomination, that has been done in this case. Over the the article's proponents to establish why this should stay.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 07:13, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not pass WP:GNG and has not played at a sufficient sporting level. GiantSnowman 11:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom, fails WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 11:43, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, with condolences to the creator. Continue the hard work, but best to learn the notability criteria first.  The Blue Canoe  12:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:FOOTYN as has not played in a national competition. no indication of GNG. Fenix down (talk) 15:13, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.