Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PoliPundit

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 23:49, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)

PoliPundit
Delete. Simply not notable enough for Wikipedia. This is a good blog, but it's just an average one in terms of notability.--YHoshua 14:24, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep 260,000 Google hits. Not my cup of tea, but seems notable enough for a small entry. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  15:09, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * 260,000 Google hits is not uncommon for a blog. We've rejected scores of other blogs with much more Google hits than that. If Google hits are the measure, than we'll need to change the deletion of countless other blogs.--YHoshua 15:32, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * The blogosphere messes with google results. Wonkette is a notable political blog; this isn't. hfool/Roast me 02:54, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)(Ooops, forgot to vote. Delete. hfool/Roast me 03:05, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC))
 * Weak Delete, borderline notable given previous blog votes. Megan1967 00:55, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, a blog should perhaps approach the name recognition of a general news site to be encyclopedic. Wyss 10:40, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Yank. Bye. --JuntungWu 10:53, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. Bart133 03:23, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.