Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Police Camera Action! 2007 series criticisms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete-- JForget 00:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Police Camera Action! 2007 series criticisms

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod, so here we go... I can't imagine a purer piece of original research than this, and I can see no possible way a neutral version of this article could be created — even in the unlikely event sources could be found, it would simply change it from a piece of original research to an indiscriminate collection of reviews. —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  21:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR and WP:NPOV; if there's no sources it is likely one's own opinion, so it counts for both.  NA SC AR Fan 24 (radio me!) 22:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete About as unencyclopedic as it gets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redfiona99 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't like the ITV News at Ten Thirty. Should I through together an article about that? Regan123 17:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete textbook example of WP:OR Will (talk) 23:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as the epitome of WP:OR. Who is making these criticisms other than the author? TreeKittens 00:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:SOAP, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, WP:MADEUP, WP:NOT, WP:RS, WP:V, WP:N... whew. How many policies can you cite?--WaltCip 18:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.