Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Police Commissioner of Jaipur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Police Commissioner of Jaipur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not shown to have independent notability to Jaipur, but not even mentioned as a notable position or group in the main Jaipur article. Created by blocked user. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 03:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 03:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 03:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 03:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Non notable people, non notable position. Ajf773 (talk) 04:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. -The Gnome (talk) 05:47, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This isn't even an article on the person. It appears to be a general definition of the post its self. Doesn't need its own article. Edaham (talk) 08:48, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with the above comments, a non-notable post held by a non-notable individual. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:38, 23 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.