Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PolicyNet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  00:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

PolicyNet

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to meet any notability standard, including WP:GNG. Cannot find reliable sources, especially independent ones. Additionally, WP:TNT applies due to absence of NPOV. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:00, 22 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Due to being an advert article about a topic that clearly doesn't lacks any kind of notability. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.