Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Policy Innovations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge/redirect. W.marsh 22:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Policy Innovations

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:SPAM and WP:COI Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to this and its parent organization. Maintained by an IP associated with the organization. This is one Part of a long history of Spam and promotion on Wikipedia, See also - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 06:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with Carnegie Council. It seems to have some notability, based on a quick Google search, but doesn't seem to get a lot of press outside of similar small publications, either. Sχeptomaniacχαιρετε 17:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge. I think I proposed this for deletion before, but a merge is better.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable online publication. ("Policy innovations" Carnegie) gives 393 GS hits for their various articles -over-reaction by the nom to a round of what was seen as spamming--and some of it probably was. But  this is a notable organization by any standards, as is this publication.  . We don't delete articles about there major projects for such COI--we just examine critically and rewrite as necessary. -- DGG (talk) 03:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.