Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polina Frantsena


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Polina Frantsena

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Due to a disagreement over WP:A7 with regard to general notability, and WP:BLPPROD, I am proposing deletion of this article with no sources and none credible found. Being an extra an Sex and the City doesn’t cut it. Trillfendi (talk) 16:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:50, 31 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete can't find anything beyond passing mentions. GNG fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:40, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: nothing to suggest she passes NACTOR, I know the pain, but a single external link to IMDb does count as a source, albeit an unreliable one, so BLPPROD can't be used.   SITH   (talk)   22:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.