Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polish American Contractors Builders Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 18:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Polish American Contractors Builders Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I would like to see this saved. But as this stands, it looks like an unreferenced article about an unnotable organization (fails: WP:V, WP:M). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment The WP:V issue is easily resolved via the group's website . Notability is evidenced, in part, by this article from Fine Homebuilding. . 24.151.116.25 (talk) 18:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * V is fine, but can you explain how does the brief mention in a specialty press (Fine Homebuilding) satisfies WP:N? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  00:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nominator, due to lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. As a licensed contractor myself, I consider Fine Homebuilder an impeccably reliable source, along with its sister publication Fine Woodworking. If we had similar coverage in two or three other comparable sources, I would recommend keeping the article.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  00:57, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG. you'd expect some American coverage, but all gnews shows is one small third party hit. LibStar (talk) 06:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.